I think lines between 250-252 in file ssh-rsa.c in OpenSSH source code should be commented! REASON: Using "SecureNetTerm Client" ( http://www.securenetterm.com/ ) with "SecureKeyAgent" ver. 5.4.2.4 ( same situation: Putty + SecureKeyAgent ) to connect to OpenSSH server "OpenSSH ver. 3.6.1" using public key from Smart Card certificate causes the following errors in "/var/log/auth/errors": . . . sshd[1224] error: bad decrypted len: 36 != 20 + 15 sshd[1227] error: bad decrypted len: 36 != 20 + 15 . . . I sent a letter about this to SecureNetTerm and here is the answer: OpenSSH 3.6.1 is a little braindead when it comes to proper operation of Certificates. All you have to do is edit the OpenSSL file ssh-rsa.c and comment out lines 250-252. This is a redundant length check that is not technically correct. The OpenSSH team is aware of the problem but don't care since they have no idea how to use certificates. The length check is not redundant since the result might be too small for example ... I commented out lines 250-252 and problem disapeared. Please fix this issue because otherwise we could not use Smart-card certificates with OpenSSH server at all :( Best regards Stefan Hadjistoytchev
fixed for the next release (replaced != with <)
This bugs seems to reappear in Version 3.7.1, it seemed to be fixed in 2.6.2. Any idea what's going wrong here?
The change was backed out. There was some discussion about it: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=105584179630664 $ cvs log ssh-rsa.c revision 1.30 date: 2003/06/18 11:28:11; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +13 -22 branches: 1.30.2; backout last change, since it violates pkcs#1 switch to share/misc/license.template ---------------------------- revision 1.29 date: 2003/06/16 08:22:35; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3 make sure the signature has at least the expected length (don't insist on len == hlen + oidlen, since this breaks some smartcards) bugzilla #592; ok djm@
Mass change of RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED
see also http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/msg14307.html