View | Details | Raw Unified | Return to bug 801
Collapse All | Expand All

(-)faq.html (-1 / +18 lines)
Lines 17-23 Link Here
17
17
18
<h1>OpenSSH FAQ (Frequently asked questions)</h1>
18
<h1>OpenSSH FAQ (Frequently asked questions)</h1>
19
19
20
<strong>Date: 2002/04/03</strong>
20
<strong>Date: 2004/02/27</strong>
21
21
22
<hr>
22
<hr>
23
23
Lines 41-46 Link Here
41
	<li><a href= "#2.7">2.7 - X11 and/or agent forwarding does not work.</a>
41
	<li><a href= "#2.7">2.7 - X11 and/or agent forwarding does not work.</a>
42
	<li><a href= "#2.8">2.8 - After upgrading OpenSSH I lost SSH2 support.</a>
42
	<li><a href= "#2.8">2.8 - After upgrading OpenSSH I lost SSH2 support.</a>
43
	<li><a href= "#2.9">2.9 - sftp/scp fails at connection, but ssh is OK.</a>
43
	<li><a href= "#2.9">2.9 - sftp/scp fails at connection, but ssh is OK.</a>
44
	<li><a href= "#2.10">2.10 - Will you add [foo] to scp?</a>
44
	</ul>
45
	</ul>
45
<h3><a href= "#3.0">3.0 - Portable OpenSSH Questions</a></h3>
46
<h3><a href= "#3.0">3.0 - Portable OpenSSH Questions</a></h3>
46
	<ul>
47
	<ul>
Lines 467-472 You can verify if your shell is doing th Link Here
467
<p>
468
<p>
468
If the above command produces any output, then you need to modify your 
469
If the above command produces any output, then you need to modify your 
469
shell initialization.
470
shell initialization.
471
472
<h2><a name= "2.10">2.10 - Will you add [foo] to scp?</a></h2>
473
474
<p>
475
Short Answer: no.
476
477
<p>
478
Long Answer: scp is a non-standard.  The closest thing it has to a
479
specification is "what rcp does".  Since the same command is used on both ends
480
of the connection, adding features or options risks interoperability with other
481
implementations.
482
483
<p>
484
485
New features are more likely in sftp, since the protocol is standardized
486
(well, a draft standard), and the client and server are decoupled.
470
487
471
<h2><u><a name= "3.0">3.0 - Portable OpenSSH Questions</a></u></h2>
488
<h2><u><a name= "3.0">3.0 - Portable OpenSSH Questions</a></u></h2>
472
489

Return to bug 801