| Summary: | Add ED25519 support to SSHFP dns record | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Portable OpenSSH | Reporter: | Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden> | ||||
| Component: | ssh | Assignee: | Assigned to nobody <unassigned-bugs> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | djm, grawity, mancha1, simon | ||||
| Priority: | P5 | ||||||
| Version: | -current | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||
| Bug Depends on: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 2226 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Loganaden Velvindron
2014-01-18 23:45:14 AEDT
Created attachment 2399 [details]
ed25519 sshfp dns
No, the SSH_FP_* values are defined in RFC4255 and new ones will require IETF consensus. This is unlikely to happen for Ed25519 unless and until a RFC is published for the key format. (In reply to Damien Miller from comment #2) > No, the SSH_FP_* values are defined in RFC4255 and new ones will > require IETF consensus. This is unlikely to happen for Ed25519 > unless and until a RFC is published for the key format. I'm working on that :-) (In reply to Damien Miller from comment #2) > No, the SSH_FP_* values are defined in RFC4255 and new ones will > require IETF consensus. This is unlikely to happen for Ed25519 > unless and until a RFC is published for the key format. I'm working on that :-) *** Bug 2223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This is committed and will be in openssh-6.7 Close all bugs left open from 6.6 and 6.7 releases. |