| Summary: | RFE: PATH_SSH_KEY_SIGN, SSH_RAND_HELPER | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Portable OpenSSH | Reporter: | Jens Elkner <elkner> |
| Component: | sshd | Assignee: | OpenSSH Bugzilla mailing list <openssh-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P2 | ||
| Version: | -current | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
|
Description
Jens Elkner
2003-05-04 06:27:38 AEST
No, we want less options rather than more. You can always use symlinks... Symlinks are not a solution. E.g., if you install openssh on a shared volume (i.e. NFS) named /usr/local, you can't expect, that the admin creates on dozens of other machines a link from /usr/sbin/.... to /usr/local/,,,. Furthermore symlinks are a bad solution wrt. NFS shared fs. E.g. something refers to /usr/sbin/... and that is a link to /usr/local, which is an NFS drive, which is not available for any reason, the whole machine starts hanging. Also symlinks may sometimes impose security risk and are usually slower than direct access. Hardcoding pathes is really an ancient practice and should be avoided in a modern application. Symlinks are not a solution as well, they are more or less an "instrument" to save diskspace and to "keep files uptodate". It is NOT an "instrument" to solve application weaknesses! Sorry, as I said: we are not adding extra options for this. Mass change of RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED |